"Abysmal", "embarrassing", "mind-numbingly bad": Twitter was not impressed by Stars in Their Eyes
ITV swapped Matthew Kelly for Harry Hill – but should the original have ever been rebooted?
But against this tide of dislike, it wasn't all bad – a few lone voices were fans of the new series, and took to social media to defend it.
Want to see this content?
We're not able to show you this content from Twitter. Please sign out of Contentpass to view this content.
And some others managed to find silver linings even if the format didn't entirely convince
Want to see this content?
We're not able to show you this content from Twitter. Please sign out of Contentpass to view this content.
At the end of the day we have to ask – was it even worth reviving? This guy seems to sum up a lot of Twitter feeling on the subject.
Want to see this content?
We're not able to show you this content from Twitter. Please sign out of Contentpass to view this content.
But a series of embedded tweets can't fully gauge the reaction – what did you think? Was the Stars in Their Eyes reboot a disaster that should never have happened, or is it a big improvement on the Matthew Kelly years? Vote now!Should Stars in their Eyes have been revived?
Authors
Huw Fullerton is a Commissioning Editor for Radio Times magazine, covering Entertainment, Comedy and Specialist Drama.
